I have a relatively small portfolio of several hundred domain names.

All are parked, but I am having a number of 5 page web sites being built. Each will have content; photos; basic SEO and a few quality back links, to get the sites rolling.

The price I feel is fair of a few hundred dollars to create each, however, the goal is to have all the names developed. This is the way to go in achieving any potential revenue, in time.

That said, although there would be a quantity discount for “X” number of web sites being built at a time, this will still take me awhile , to have say 50 names developed, per year, due to my slim budget.

At this pace, even with potential revenues from developed web sites (being developed now), it could easily surpass, 10 years, to develop all the names. I am not feeling the love for that scenario!

— That all said, for lower cost purposes and to achieve a much higher “build out” of the domain names I have, would it be realistic to develop, and rely on the growth of 1 page web sites that will have similar basic SEO, content; photos and quality back links applied, much like with what I am doing now with the larger 5 page web sites?

I feel that although the 1 page web sites may not achieve a higher page ranking, as quickly, as the multi page web site, they are at least created (alive, and not dead — like a Parked Page), and no matter how slowly they are growing, a modest revenue could be realized.

This is somewhat analogous to the tremendous portfolio owners’ parked 1 pagers, but unlike those 1 pagers — these 1 page web sites will have a full page of content, some photos, basic SEO, and a few quality back links — a distinct difference for consumer experience.

— Do you think this slim budget approach in creating a lot more web sites, 1 pagers as described above — in a much shorter period of time, is the best way, as far as overall effectiveness, in growth and potential revenues are concerned?

Thank you very much for your time.

Brad